zhoulongmiao14

Famed especially for their stylish heels the Jimmy Choo brand has altered very little of the Classic Ugg structure.  The Choo contribution relies heavily on the application of fringeCheap Ugg Boots and studs.  The animal prints are an exciting use of pattern previously seen only in the UGG kids collection.  I don’t know why Ugg hasn’t done it sooner.  You shoe scholars will be asking yourself the obvious question, “Why didn’t they add heels?  The most obvious design mod.”  My only conclusion is they wanted to play it safe, not re invent the wheel.  Ugg already has heeled shoes, which are not the primary draw. Choo was obviously only given the Classic collection to expand on. These are clearly be-dazzled UGGs not fleecy CHOOs.

If anything is to be takenUGG 5825 from this it’s that anyone can modify a pair of Uggs to fit their style, the Ugg Classic really is a blank canvas to make your own footwear masterpiece.  Choo, unlike some other celebrity style lines (search ‘Jessica Simpson Birkenstocks’), hasn’t destroyed the essential virtues of the brand in the process of making their mark. Since no one got hurt maybe this is a really successful collaboration.   Choo seems to think so.  They carry all the variations they have created, oddly Ugg doesn’t.   Here’s what Jimmy Choo founder and CCO, Tamara Melloon has to say about how Choo-s and Uggs goUGG 5815 together, “Other then Jimmy Choo, UGG Australia is the only other footwear I have in my wardrobe. I wear it at home in New York, on holiday in Malibu and as an essential travel accessory for my plane wardrobe. We are delighted to have created a special capsule that captures the best of both brands – the legendary comfort of UGG with the spirit of Jimmy Choo.” (*see footnote)